ais523 wrote: > On Thu, 2009-02-26 at 13:33 -0800, Ed Murphy wrote: >> Proposal: Support Plutocracy >> (AI = 2, please) >> >> Create a rule titled "Support Plutocracy" with Power 2 and this text: >> >> A player CAN, with 4 support, change a democratic decision >> with Adoption Index less than 3 to be ordinary. > > Isn't this broken due to the first paragraph of rule 2196? > I like the idea, though.
Possibly, but only for proposals with AI >= 2; you could still reverse an ordinary-to-democratic conversion. More generally, how much substantive gamestate is actually defined at Power < 2 nowadays? Inquiry and equity cases, yes, but encouraging high-caste players to focus there is probably a bad idea. Someone might want to review Power = 2 rules and look for portions that can reasonably be separated out into lower-Power rules.
