On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 12:39 AM, Sgeo <sgeos...@gmail.com> wrote: >> [stuff] > > As far as I remember, my confession was not that I violated a rule, > just that I failed to throughly consider the consequences of not > reading the ruleset during read the ruleset week.
This-- and e contested the NoV (as far as I can see, the only message the defendant sent during the case!) with the following, which the CotC probably should have included in the case history: > I Contest this NoV on the basis that it is unclear whether it is > possible to violate a SHOULD. Whether or not someone confessing to breaking the rules should be considered guilty prima facie, this isn't that case. Goethe, if you don't want the judge to have to look the case up, why did your proto remove the pre-trial phase?
