Kerim Aydin wrote: > I pledge that I CAN resolve any CFJ (whether assigned to me or not) by > standing > on my head and saying "QUACK". > > If asked to reconsider, I shall say "MOO". > > We can now repeal the judicial system, and R101(ii) will remain satisfied.
The reason that this doesn't work is that a contract is insufficiently-powered to redefine Rule-used terms; in this case, "resolve" and "reconsideration". If a power-3 Rule declared that you standing on your head and saying "QUACK" was sufficient to resolve a matter of controversy (and similarly for reconsidering MOO), then this would be sufficient to satisfy R101(ii). However, as it isn't, it ain't. That's nomic. .... oh wait, R754(4). nevermind.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
