On Tue, 3 Feb 2009, Charles Reiss wrote: >> d. Key Power: *Any* shareholder (member or non member) may act >> on behalf of the corporation with the support of [shareholders >> adding up to a majority] Corporations CANNOT and SHALL NOT >> forbid non-members from so acting or supporting said actions. >> Shareholders are encouraged to use corps for their own benefit >> (i.e. the AFO). > > Given this, I'd encourage allowing 0-party contracts and encouraging > corporations to be contracts of this sort.
Well, if they're 0-party contracts, we're basically making them player entities with tradable controls, and there's no reason to make them contracts at all, we could just make a new type of entity. I was thinking myself that requiring members offers a double-dynamic of allowing the members of the corporations somewhat responsible to shareholders; e.g. contracts that are more likely to add value to the game would have a stronger share price (benefiting the members that start with a controlling stake). But maybe this is dreaming and we should just make some straight-out zombies. What do you think? -Goethe
