On Sat, Jan 31, 2009 at 3:15 PM, Kerim Aydin <[email protected]> wrote: > The whole reason we made Rests transfer to first-class members of > partnerships was so that we could make first-class members take > responsibility for their partnerships' actions. This was a deliberate > repair to a broken equity system, and you're suggesting we break it > again.
It's already broken. With the current system, there's an incentive for me to spend all my notes on partnerships' voting power, which cannot be reduced even if they break the rules. Anyway, with Agoran Consent registration, having your partnership deregistered is a pretty big disincentive. (Though I agree that a more balanced system than just empowering existing partnerships is needed for them if we're giving them back fun stuff like democratic voting and judgeship.)
