On Sun, 18 Jan 2009, Charles Schaefer wrote: > 2009/1/12, Kerim Aydin <ke...@u.washington.edu>: >> It would be interesting to see what an independent group (note: B's not, >> but may be enough so) with the Agoran ruleset but no Agoran judicial >> precedents. -goethe. > > > They would find Michael Norrish and ask him to join their game so they could > have a speaker. > > Then again, perhaps an offshoot of Agora could be considered the "second > game"
Even if not, the game could proceed without a speaker or with Michael as speaker even unknowingly (and with a round of deputization could bootstrap officer elections I believe). -Goethe
