ais523 wrote: > * OBVIOUS, appropriate if the statement was uncontroversially true
Should be OBVIOUSLY. > When a judge assigns a positive or negative judgement, e SHALL in the > same message submit a proposal (known as the case's Standardisation > Proposal) which would, if adopted: > * change the rules so that if substantially similar circumstances > to the circumstances leading to the case being called occur in > the future, the analogous statement would be obviously true (or > false if the judgement was a negative judgement), and > * modify the gamestate to be what it would be if the statement of > the case had been true at the time that the case was called (or > false if the judgement was a negative judgement). > > Whenever an Agoran Decision on a Standardisation Proposal is resolved as > REJECTED or FAILED QUORUM, an appeal concerning the assignment of > judgement in the question on resolution of the associated inquiry case > is initiated. As long as you're copying Oracularities from 4E B, why not also copy the way they take effect when the case can no longer be appealed? (Though B's time limit there was four days rather than two weeks, so maybe the judge can implement eir changes without objection if e is still judge and the case is neither overturned nor pending on appeal.)
