On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 9:49 PM, comex <com...@gmail.com> wrote: > I intend to appeal this judgement with two support. > Arguments: This deserves a REASSIGN under the corruptive self-interest clause.
My scam's success hinges entirely on whether preemptive objections work, whether Goethe's scam worked is irrelevant to mine. Granted writing a quick judgment right before the Holiday deadline extension expired rather than waiting and writing more detailed reasoning was probably unwise, but I do believe my reasoning about the 4 day timing is correct, and I also believe that no matter how detailed of a judgment I wrote I'd be overturned on appeal since in this case the scamster is more popular with the establishment than you are and the usually suspects will line up behind him instead of fighting to overturn the scam like when you pull them.
