On Wed, 2009-01-07 at 20:13 -0500, Sgeo wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 9:45 PM, Alex Smith <ais...@bham.ac.uk> wrote:
> > On Tue, 2009-01-06 at 21:22 -0500, comex wrote:
> >> On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 9:05 PM, Charles Schaefer
> >> <chuckles11...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> > Inquiry CFJ: {The current Speaker is Michael Norrish.}
> >>
> >> See CFJs 2155 and 1534.
> >
> > Someone told me that I'm the Speaker now. I'm not entirely sure whether
> > I am or not, but I've been de-facto doing the job for a while via
> > deputisation.
> >
> > Disclaimer: The actions in the rest of this message fail if I am not
> > Speaker; I wouldn't want to mislead anyone into thinking they succeed if
> > I am not.
> >
> > I assign prerogatives for January 2009 as follows (note that these fail
> > if the players in question aren't MWoPs, I'm relying on Murphy's website
> > for that and it's been wrong in the past):
> > ais523: Wielder of Veto [I've tried a few, and I like this one]
> > BobTHJ: Wielder of Extra Votes [we all know how e loves voting power]
> > Pavitra: Default Officeholder [to have someone active here just in case]
> > Zefram: Wielder of Rubberstamp [by elimination]
> > pikhq: Justiciar [make this someone supine to help out the CotC]
> >
> > I intend to deputise for the Speaker to make the above assignments (in
> > case I'm not the speaker; the deputisation does nothing if I am).
> > --
> I think we need to wait until the CFJs regarding recent win attempts
> are resolved.
Note that I think MWoP's half-pragmatised; IIRC, if a player hasn't been
awarded it by the Herald, they definitely aren't, and if they have been,
then they are only if they won.
--
ais523
