On Fri, 26 Dec 2008, Kerim Aydin wrote: > On Thu, 25 Dec 2008, Alex Smith wrote: >> Any person CAN agree to this contract. The agreement need not be done by >> announcement; any action, in any nomic, which has the effect of agreeing >> to this contract is sufficient to constitute agreement to this contract, >> as long as such agreement is permitted by the rules (especially rule >> 101). > > This was actually covered in a past CFJ; to wit, any action that has > a primary purpose that doesn't have to do with giving permission to > join a contract can't be construed to be a "consent-granting" action > just because a contract says it is. Anyone remember the CFJ #? > > -G.
Please ignore this... I need another cup of coffee before trying to interpret anything this morning. -G.
