On Tue, 23 Dec 2008, Ed Murphy wrote: > Goethe wrote: > >> [Murphy, I told you we should have specifically disabled dependent actions >> altogether for the duration... :) Though I guess you didn't disagree... >> looks like a fun two weeks to wait for the CFJs] > > Is there any remaining ambiguity that would warrant violating the > prohibition on assigning/judging during the holiday?
If the scam worked, w/o objections are more or less fixed I think. If it didn't work, they weren't broken in the first place (although if they weren't broken, we have to go back to that discussion you and Wooble were having that started the whole thing on how they do work). There's no urgency as long as folks are fairly restrained with dependent action attempts in the mean time, to minimize recalculation if needed. -Goethe
