On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 10:26 AM, Elliott Hird
<penguinoftheg...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>
> On 23 Dec 2008, at 15:20, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
>
>> the compound action
>> of creating pledge-defined VP and then transforming them back to an
>> asset by terminating the pledge CANNOT modify any information for
>> which BobTHJ is required to act as recordkeepor.
>
> I intend with 2 support to appeal this judgment.

it was nttpf, so you can't yet.

Umm, take my post as a proto.  The real judgement may or may not rely
on the legal context definition of "entity", breaking the whole game.

Reply via email to