On Fri, 19 Dec 2008, Elliott Hird wrote: > seems very easy > > [129 +s, then a large, large amount of >s]
I started with 2 or 3 different "trivial and obvious" strategies that worked (no comment on this one) and was then able to then beat each one with something slightly fancier. Not to say someone won't find an unbeatable simple strategy, but finding one might be as least as challenging as an Enigma puzzle. Hmm, that's a thought... Change already: increased max #cycles/charge from 1,000 to 100,000 (tested on a tiny array, 1,000 was then not enough to traverse larger array and do anything worthwhile). -G.
