On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 7:23 PM, Ed Murphy <emurph...@socal.rr.com> wrote: > 2282 may still be affirmed on appeal. But yes, for completeness:
What does CFJ 2282 have to do with Rule 2218?
On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 7:23 PM, Ed Murphy <emurph...@socal.rr.com> wrote: > 2282 may still be affirmed on appeal. But yes, for completeness:
What does CFJ 2282 have to do with Rule 2218?