On 12 Dec 2008, at 19:41, Roger Hicks wrote:
Except the problem here is that by removing everything but the definition you have suddenly removed any value that VP once had. Sure the banks (due to not being able to instantly react to this change) will still buy them, but really all you are doing is letting the banks bailout the indebted players, which is only slightly better than the US Congress bailing out Fannie Mae. Hence why I suggested a gradual phase-out of VP that would still require the indebted to pay off their debts.
Okay then. How about if all indebted players lose their VP, so only healthy vote marketers get to reap coins/chits from it?
