On Fri, 2008-12-12 at 08:41 -0800, Ed Murphy wrote:
> ehird wrote:
>
> > On 12 Dec 2008, at 06:54, Ed Murphy wrote:
> >
> >> Proposal: Undo the scam already
> >
> > This wasn't actually the scam, you know; just the backup.
>
> It's the only part of the scam that worked, assuming that CFJ 2282
> is affirmed on appeal (I'm giving root some more time to weigh in).
>
It probably isn't helpful; if the scam did work, it could alter the
rules to prevent such a proposal passing, or working, or all sorts of
other interesting things.
--
ais523
