On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 10:57, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Proposal: Fix asset redefinition > (AI = 2, please) > > Amend Rule 2166 (Assets) by replacing this text: > > An asset is an entity defined as such by a rule or contract > (hereafter its backing document), and existing solely because > its backing document defines its existence. > > with this text: > > An asset is an entity defined as such by a rule or contract > (hereafter its backing document), and existing solely because > its backing document defines its existence. If multiple rules > and/or contracts attempt to define the same asset, then its > backing document is the one that was created first.
Can we try 'public contract' somewhere so people can't subvert proto'd public contracts by creating an appropriate private contract faster? - woggle
