On Fri, 28 Nov 2008, Alex Smith wrote: > On Thu, 2008-11-27 at 22:39 -0800, Ed Murphy wrote: >> Detail: http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/viewcase.php?cfj=2273a >> >> ============================ Appeal 2273a ============================ > I spend a Favour to call in a Favour on CFJ 2273, specifying ALREADY > TRIED. I note that there are two appropriate verdicts for this appeal, > AFFIRM and REMAND, and am using the Protection Racket to persuade the > Dons to choose a particular option in it. > > I intend, with support from two of {BobTHJ, Warrigal, the CotC}, to send > the following message on behalf of the judicial panel in CFJ 2273a:
Back in CFJ 1346, several players made a comments such as "if the appeals court can be corrupted and deliver blatantly illegal judgements, we're no longer playing Agora or have faith that we can respect a body of rules, and we might as well quit." Back then, several players really meant that. Thankfully, the appeals court at the time was an honorable one. A body of law is only as good as its defenders: Is the game currently so bankrupt as this? -G.
