Elysion wrote: > Since I wasn't in on the discussion, could someone provide the > context, please? Why do we think the PRS is not a contest? (I > just looked at a Notary's report, which says it is a contest.) It was decontestified by mistake when a Notary's Report listing it as not a contest was ratified, and contestified by deliberate 'mistake' when a Scorekeepor's Report listing it as a contest was ratified, allegedly. The CFJ is about whether the second of these ratifications worked, given that the Scorekeepor is not the recordkeepor of contestmaster. -- ais523
<<winmail.dat>>