On Sun, Nov 23, 2008 at 09:09, Benjamin Schultz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ========================== Equity Case 2254 ==========================
>
> ehird, comex, Quazie, and myself have failed to meet their
> obligations per section 10 of the Vote Market agreement.
>
> ========================================================================
>
> ("Myself" in the CFJ statement refers to Sgeo.)
>
>
> The current Vote Market report on the bob-space web site has the following
> VP holdings:
> comex 8
> ehird 3
> Quazie 42
> Sgeo 2
>
> These amounts are below the minimum holding of 50 required by section 10 of
> the Vote Market. I therefore require these four players to increase their
> holdings of vote points per the following equation:
>
> The players comex, ehird, Quazie, and Sgeo shall, within the next two weeks,
> acquire sufficient vote points from other parties to the Vote Market to
> bring their holdings of VP up to 50. If the parties cannot agree on terms
> for exchanging vote points, the transactions shall be priced at the PBA's
> current rate of 14 Coins or the RBOA's current rate of 70 Chits, at the
> purchaser's choice. (I am hard-coding the default rates in this equation to
> avoid unnecessary rate manipulation.) The players comex, ehird, Quazie, and
> Sgeo shall also vote SELL (2VP) for at least half their available votes on
> EVERY proposal for the next four weeks or until they are no longer Indebted,
> whichever comes first.
This is rather broad in my estimation. It would seem that any VM party
is required to sell VP even if this would cause them to become
indebted.
BobTHJ
