On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 8:01 PM, Joshua Boehme <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The only argument I can see around that is to argue that a substantially and > deliberately incorrect attempted resolution fails to satisfy 208(c), and thus > the Agoran decisions on proposals 5956 and 5962 have not been resolved.
This is the standard interpretation, even in the case of accidentally incorrect voting results. However, each of the voting results I published was intended to be correct; although some were not due to my mistake, depending on some obscure interpretation issues (Vote Market, proposal vs. decision) I believe that my most recent one worked as expected.
