Taral wrote: > On Sun, Nov 16, 2008 at 4:18 PM, comex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> 5961 >> >> 0x44 F >> ais523 F >> BobTHJ F >> comex A >> ehird F >> Pavitra F > > COE: This omits my vote.
If the scam worked, then ehird created a rule invalidating all votes except these six. How this should be patched in the general case is not obvious. At least one Power=1 rule (2127, Conditional Votes) legitimately invalidates certain votes (indirectly, by defining a standard for "clearly identified" for such votes).
