On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 2:11 PM, Roger Hicks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Note that I did not have a reasonable chance to review the first > change that ehird and Wooble made to the Protection Racket (the change > that removed my ability to leave the contract and permitted them to > change it at will - it all happened while I was asleep). I don't know > how this effects the judgment. I did have a reasonable chance to > review the later changes.
R101 (iv) does not consider such amendments to be ineffective if you did not have a reasonable opportunity to review them; it merely allows you to consider yourself not bound by them until you do have such a reasonable opportunity.
