On Sun, 2008-11-02 at 12:41 -0600, Pavitra wrote: > On Sunday 26 October 2008 11:30:38 am Kerim Aydin wrote: > > On Sun, 26 Oct 2008, Kerim Aydin wrote: > > > On Sat, 25 Oct 2008, Ed Murphy wrote: > > >> Revisiting my B.N. thesis (11/29/07) on partnerships, I've > > >> identified the following general models of partnership control. > > >> Can anyone think of any others? > > >> > > >> * Consentual (e.g. Pineapple, Human Point Two) > > >> * Capitalist (e.g. Primo, Reformed Bank) > > >> * Unilateral (e.g. AFO) > > >> * Democratic (e.g. PerlNomic, Normish) > > > > * Rotational autocratic (a dictator has complete power over > > partnership except for the rule that requires the dictatorship to > > rotate). > > Or, y'know, nonrotational autocratic. Unlikely to occur outside of > scams in its pure form, but may occur along a continuum (e.g., the > contract's primary recordkeepor can cause it to act W3O, but no one > else can).
The Protection Racket became nonrotational oligarchic due to a scam. That one wasn't mentioned yet... -- ais523
