About the proposed installation of BobTHJ as Coinkeepor:

* Is it really necessary any more, now there's an AAA
  report online? I was a big supporter at the time because
  most of the PBA/AAA problems were caused by ehird not
  knowing crop holdings, but the online AAA report seems
  to have fixed that.

* Do people here think that a change in who is technically
  Coinkeepor would affect which of the online PBA reports
  they used? There are two at the moment, both of which
  are out-of-date atm, so probably there's scope for
  improvement from both sides. Personally, I'm likely to
  continue using the more usable report whatever; as I
  don't see any reason why both reports wouldn't stay
  correct nowadays, that's likely to be the one with more
  useful features.

* Given that the PBA's rates can be calculated platonically
  by anyone, does its recordkeepor really matter all that
  much? ehird has told me privately that e would very much
  like to stay as PBA recordkeepor; it also seems a useful
  way to get em to actually do some useful work. (I'm all
  for it as long as it relieves load on BobTHJ, not creates
  it; and I don't see why it wouldn't nowadays.)

ehird's almost convinced me to oppose the PBA motion to
install em as Coinkeepor, but I'd like to hear the other
side of the argument, given current circumstances. (If a
fully automated system is set up, it won't really matter
who is recordkeepor at all, I assume.)

-- 
ais523

Reply via email to