About the proposed installation of BobTHJ as Coinkeepor: * Is it really necessary any more, now there's an AAA report online? I was a big supporter at the time because most of the PBA/AAA problems were caused by ehird not knowing crop holdings, but the online AAA report seems to have fixed that.
* Do people here think that a change in who is technically Coinkeepor would affect which of the online PBA reports they used? There are two at the moment, both of which are out-of-date atm, so probably there's scope for improvement from both sides. Personally, I'm likely to continue using the more usable report whatever; as I don't see any reason why both reports wouldn't stay correct nowadays, that's likely to be the one with more useful features. * Given that the PBA's rates can be calculated platonically by anyone, does its recordkeepor really matter all that much? ehird has told me privately that e would very much like to stay as PBA recordkeepor; it also seems a useful way to get em to actually do some useful work. (I'm all for it as long as it relieves load on BobTHJ, not creates it; and I don't see why it wouldn't nowadays.) ehird's almost convinced me to oppose the PBA motion to install em as Coinkeepor, but I'd like to hear the other side of the argument, given current circumstances. (If a fully automated system is set up, it won't really matter who is recordkeepor at all, I assume.) -- ais523