On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 4:56 AM, warrigal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > But if the Terre Haute is "the Terre Haute", then it is a string, > which exists independently of the contract, so the contract cannot > make it an asset.
Wait, that doesn't follow. "The Terre Haute" was defined to be the *name* of the asset, not the asset itself. If you are claiming that the string of characters actually becomes the asset, then you need to justify why that happens. -root
