On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 8:07 PM, Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I really wondered about that, and erred for more freedom with MAY. > I prob. SHOULD use SHOULD though. -G.
Hmm. Both "SHOULD be interpreted" and "MAY be interpreted" take the form of obligating someone (presumably the person reading the Rules, or the judge) to interpret the Rules a certain way, which sort of departs from recent game custom. I prefer "is interpreted", which preserves the legal fiction that the Rules have one "true" interpretation, and CFJs just help to find out what it is. (Or "may be" in the sense of "might be", not "MAY be".)
