On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 4:08 AM, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > ============================== CFJ 2225 ============================== > > Taral's attempted vote of SELL(3VP) on the most recent Mad > Scientist election constitutes a pledge. > > ========================================================================
Missed this. FALSE. A pledge is too complicated to be inferred in this way (unless there's been a clear precedent of people making vote-pledges), and anyway the average Agoran reading the purported vote would probably assume that it was a Vote Market Sell Ticket (not knowing that Taral was not a party to the Vote Market). Altogether entirely too unclear to implicitly make a contract, although if this vote had been posted more recently, Taral might have been violating R2215. (This confirms that 2224 is FALSE.)
