On Sun, Oct 26, 2008 at 12:19 AM, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [Proposal 5800 doesn't specify a rule amendment.]
Arguably, it doesn't meet the definition of a proposal then. CFJ 1834 would imply that it is a proposal, although the judge there didn't consider the issue at hand. For note purposes, I'm treating it as an adopted proposal until proven otherwise. -root
