Pavitra wrote: > On Friday 24 October 2008 11:14:43 am Ed Murphy wrote: >> The initiator is unqualified to be assigned as judge of the >> case. All other members of the bases of the parties to the >> contract are also unqualified, except while this would result >> in all entities being unqualified. > > I'm not necessarily recommending changing it, but can someone explain > the advantages and disadvantages of this version versus "all other > members of the bases of the parties to the contract are poorly > qualified"?
Rule 1868 says the CotC SHALL NOT assign a poorly-qualified judge. In this situation, EXCUSED is possible, but not guaranteed (is it worse to assign a poorly-qualified judge, or to leave the case unassigned?).
