On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 2:41 PM, Alexander Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Goethe wrote: >> On Thu, 23 Oct 2008, Ed Murphy wrote: >> > Gratuitous Arguments by Pavitra: >> > An equitable resolution of the situation would be for ais523 to >> > destroy one 3 Crop and one 9 Crop. >> >> I hereby solicit comments from AAA parties (esp. ais523) on the equitability >> of Pavitra's proposed settlement. -Goethe > > I submit the following arguments on CFJ 2215: > > I've been keeping a 3 Crop and a 9 Crop back just in case. Most people seem to > agree that 11 crops would have been a more sensible amount than 9 crops to > give me for the harvests, but the letter of the contract required a 9-crop > award. I think probably it would be easiest for me to merely destroy the > erroneously-created crops in order to correct BobTHJ's (and my) mistake about > the letter of the contract.
Also note that if the same harvests were performed today, it *would* be 11 crops. I'm content to let em keep them. -root
