BobTHJ wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 23:35, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> BobTHJ wrote:
>>> I vote LLAMA(SELL(2VP - PRESENT)) on the above proposals.
>> Both LLAMA() and SELL() implicitly define a conditional vote. On the
>> democratic proposals, one of these is invalid, but it's unclear which
>> one. Thus, by Rule 478's requirement to be unambiguous, I interpret
>> the entire action as ineffective.
>>
>>
> I'm not sure what is so difficult here....it seems pretty easy to
> resolve this to me. A Sell Ticket to cast a LLAMA conditional vote?
Vice versa.
> I agree to the following pledge (titled SLAMA):
> {
> A vote of SLAMA(X - Y) is shorthand for posting a Sell Ticket with a
> cost of X and casting a LLAMA conditional vote of the filler's
> choosing, or alternately casting a LLAMA conditional vote of Y if the
> ticket is not filled.
>
> BobTHJ may modify or terminate this pledge by announcement.
> }
>
> I retract any previous votes on the above proposals and vote SLAMA(2VP
> - PRESENT) on all those proposals.
I see no problem with this, and suggest adding it to the Llama
contract (inserting "by a member of the Vote Market" near the start)
