Wooble wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 18, 2008 at 3:26 PM, The PerlNomic Partnership
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> 5801 O 1 1.5 Murphy Left in a Huff
>
> The distribution of this proposal may have failed; Murphy retracted it
> before it was distributed.
I re-submitted a revised version (named "Fix Left in a Huff" as
originally intended, but I'm not announcing the error because I
don't want to cancel the voting period on a technicality with no
significant legal effect).
> I'm not sure what the consensus currently
> is on proposals created by the act of distribution.
A proposal is defined as "a document outlining changes" etc. (Rule 106);
neither its existence nor the Promotor's ability to distribute it (Rule
1607) depend on it having been submitted; what submission does is
a) give it an author and possibly co-authors
b) place it in the pool, eventually requiring the Promotor to
distribute it
