On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 11:10 AM, Geoffrey Spear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 11:01 AM, Sgeo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Wasn't there a CFJ about this? > > CFJ 2177 held that "Mr. Elbow" was not a nickname for Ivan Hope > because it was defined as a player on whose behalf e could act by > announcement, and there were 2 such players, causing ambiguity. In > this case, there is only one non-registered entity Ivan Hope can act > on behalf of (emself), so there's no ambiguity IMO. > > The contract stuff will probably require a separate CFJ, but I'm > definitely not recording a white ribbon in the possession of a player > named "Kyle". >
I was referring to the contract stuff, actually. I remember discussion here about some CFJ regarding contracts that claim that doing something means you agree to the contract..
