On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 10:35 AM, Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 9:12 AM, ais523 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> > You just ratified oklopol as a player, the Monster as a player, and
>>> > Zefram as on hold.
>>>
>>> The important thing is that I ratified myself as a player.
>>>
>> Wow, I missed that one altogether. A nice trivial scam...
>
> Is it even possible to ratify playerhood given the precedent of CFJ
> 1856?  R101 takes precedence over R1551.

Er, never mind.  Rereading CFJ 1856, it's not relevant to the case at hand.

-root

Reply via email to