On Thu, Oct 9, 2008 at 9:14 PM, Ben Caplan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thursday 09 October 2008 05:34:37 pm Ian Kelly wrote: >> 10. A farmer's milling queue is initially empty. A farmer (the >> miller) may add milling jobs to the end of any farmer's milling >> queue by announcement, with the consent of that farmer. At the >> beginning of each week, after Digit Ranches produce crops, each >> Mill processes and removes the first available milling job with a >> matching Operator, if any, from its owner's milling queue. > > I don't think this works the way you want. For example, if Alice adds > a milling job to the end of Bob's milling queue, and Bob owns no > mills of eir own, then the job will never be processed. > > Maybe like this.... > > 9. (...) > used in the expression is destroyed from the baker's possession if > possible, and then if two crops were so destroyed, one crop of the > result is created in the baker's possession. > > 10. The milling queue is initially empty. A farmer (the miller) may > add milling jobs to the end of the milling queue by announcement, > optionally specifying a farmer (the baker); if no baker is specified, > it defaults to the miller. At the beginning of each week, after Digit > Ranches produce crops, each Mill processes and removes from the > milling queue the first available milling job, if any, with a > matching Operator and miller equal to the Mill's owner.
I don't see what difference it makes. In your version, if the miller has no mills, the job still never gets processed. -root
