ais523 wrote: > On Thu, 2008-10-09 at 09:21 -0700, Ed Murphy wrote: >> ais523 wrote: >> >>> The loophole is still open, but only because I couldn't figure out an >>> easy way to close it; I've promised to not use it further until I can >>> figure out a sensible fix (or someone can tell me one), at which point I >>> can use it to close itself. >> If it worked, then couldn't you use it to amend the Monster? > > Yes, I could. The problem is that the bug isn't anywhere in the Monster > rule; the existence of the Monster, rather than its text, is what causes > the problem. I think it's probably possible to reword the Mad Scientist > rule so that it doesn't cause the problem; but my favoured solution at > the moment is to export the Monster to B, where it can live in peace and > harmony (or not, as the case may be).
Well, you could use it to amend the Mad Scientist rule, then. I'm good with the export if B is, though.
