On Thu, Oct 9, 2008 at 9:09 AM, ais523 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > So, in other words, the Monster may change the rules, and so I CAN > change the rules, but I may not change the rules so R101(i) says I can't > change the rules after all? I'm not entirely certain I follow that > logic, or that it makes sense. (If you think I CAN but MAY NOT change > the rules, I suggest a criminal CFJ, but I don't think that's what you > think.)
No, I believe the Monster CAN but MAY NOT change the rules, that that you therefore CANNOT do so as you CAN only cause the Monster to do things it MAY do.
