On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 4:51 PM, Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 4:46 PM, Taral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 5:10 AM, ehird <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> The rules, at least before ais's scam. >> >> Huh? My understanding is that ais523 was not the Registrar, so e could >> not make it a public forum. > > ais523 is the Registrar. It was Murphy attempting to change it back > who could not.
There's still legitimate question as to whether it succeeded due to it being a spam scam variant, however. -root
