Wooble wrote: > On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 2:39 PM, comex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Hmm... I'm curious why the vote was unanimous for root, as Murphy has >> a very nice website that shows everyone's Notes and note combinations >> and e doesn't seem to have been shirking eir job. > > Murphy was soliciting people to take over the job 2 months ago.
ais523 wrote: > It was mostly to save workload on Murphy, who seems to have been doing > more than eir fair share recently (which I applaud em for). Also, I > would have ended up voting for root either way round, as I nearly always > vote in officer elections by endorsing the officer rather than with a > direct vote (except if I vote for myself); that way if they don't want > to do the job, my vote doesn't end up going for them. Ditto to all of those. Also, Conductor has the least complex automation, so was likely the easiest of my offices to hand off; in particular, there are no web- or timer-based updates (updates consisted of hand-typing things like 'update players set c_count = c_count + 1 where name in (...)' whenever I got around to it). I'll send out a final Not-Report tonight. root, how/where do you want to implement automation going forward?
