On Fri, Oct 3, 2008 at 12:23 AM, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > so the question on sentencing became inapplicable when the previous > GUILTY judgement was set aside, but became applicable again when the > new GUILTY judgement was delivered; and the judgement of the question > on sentencing stuck around during all that time, becoming ineffective > and then effective again.
Considering the appeals panel in this particular case remanded specifically to allow me to assign a harsher sentence, I'd say that's probably a bug. Although anyone who supported the appeal of the question on culpability because they thought the sentence was wrong could have just appealed the sentence, I suppose.
