On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 11:38 AM, Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Thu, 2 Oct 2008, Ian Kelly wrote: >> BobTHJ voted "SELL (5VP - AGAINST) x 5". This amounted to 5 votes of >> "SELL (5VP - AGAINST)", which resulted in 5 sets of conditional votes, >> each set resolving to (endorse filler x 5 / AGAINST x 1); and 5 >> corresponding sell tickets. > > Where are you finding this? The vote I find is: > Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > "SELL(5VP) x5" > > There's certainly no Against. Without the AGAINST (versus for example a > 5xAGAINST) missing it's unclear to me whether the x5 refers to the votes > available in one ticket or the number of tickets, so I would defer to the > buyer and seller who agree. Is there a separate ticket issue I missed?
My mistake. But the contract states that if the fallback vote is omitted, then it's present. So I interpret this as being the same scenario as I posted above, with the exception that the unfilled tickets resulted in invalid votes of PRESENT rather than invalid votes of AGAINST. -root
