On 02/10/2008, Ben Caplan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wednesday 01 October 2008 05:01:41 pm Elliott Hird wrote: >> On 1 Oct 2008, at 22:35, Ben Caplan wrote: >> > I believe it was decided that the most natural Monsterization >> > of "judgment" was "Monsteredict". Can you write a script to make >> > that kind of analysis? >> >> Did I say it'd produce the most natural monsterization all the >> time? > > You did imply it would do an acceptable job as Mad Scientist. I don't > think that's possible for a computer program. > I am learning the natural language packages.
- DIS: Re: BUS: Proposals Elliott Hird
- DIS: Re: BUS: Proposals Elliott Hird
- Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Proposals Kerim Aydin
- Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Proposals Ed Murphy
- Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Proposals Elliott Hird
- Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Proposals Ben Caplan
- Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Proposals Elliott Hird
- Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Proposals Ben Caplan
- Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Proposals Elliott Hird
- DIS: Re: BUS: Proposals Elliott Hird
- Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Proposals Ian Kelly
- Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Proposals Elliott Hird
- Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Proposals Kerim Aydin
- Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Proposals Ian Kelly
- Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Proposals Elliott Hird
- Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Proposals Elliott Hird
- Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Proposals comex
- DIS: Re: BUS: Proposals Elliott Hird