On Sun, 2008-09-28 at 14:41 -0700, Ed Murphy wrote: > ============================== CFJ 2171 ============================== > > If a person who is bound by an equity agreement fails to fulfill > eir obligations to the agreement, and the judge attempts to act > on eir behalf, but there are 3 or more objections to the > attempt, the person who failed to fulfill eir obligations may be > liable for a criminal punishment other than discharge. > > ======================================================================== Trivially TRUE, in general (there may be other reasons why it might not); and also, the judge could merely try again; failed intent to perform a dependent action does not cause the action to happen. (You're confusing "attempt" and "intend" to some extent here; an attempt to perform a dependent action fails if there was no intention or if the conditions for performing it weren't met, but this is FALSE whether you say "attempt" or "intend".) -- ais523
