On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 12:55, Geoffrey Spear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 3:25 PM, Charles Reiss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Claim of Error: Sir Toby may be the initiator of this CFJ and so this >> assignment of Sir Toby as judge may have been INEFFECTIVE. > > Would Sir Toby deputising for the CotC to deny the claim of error fix things?
I think the Right solution is for the CotC to assign Sir Toby's recent CFJ in a linked fashion with this one. (That will be ineffective if the prior assignment was valid and won't mess up the rotation.) -woggle
