On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 3:02 PM, ais523 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Also, I'm willing to retract this CFJ if it looks like it'll create too > much work, as long as someone explains to me the gist of what exactly is > going on here.
The gist of what's going on here is that you made a judgment that's not supported by precedent, and now you want to force someone else to look at that precedent and re-decide the case that you already decided. Wouldn't a legislative fix to this ambiguity be better?
