On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 10:14 AM, Roger Hicks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 6:35 AM, Geoffrey Spear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On Sun, Sep 7, 2008 at 9:35 PM, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> ========================== Equity Case 2108 ========================== >>> >>> Ivan Hope has failed to increase eir VP holdings above 50 within >>> the allotted 60 day timeframe. >> >> I judge: >> >> Ivan Hope CXXVII SHALL, for each distribution of proposals vote SELL >> (2VP) on at least half of those proposals. Parties to this equation >> SHOULD assign a sentence of EXILE should they be the judge of a CFJ >> with an applicable question on sentencing accusing Ivan Hope CXXVII of >> failing to uphold eir obligations under this equation. This equation >> terminates when Ivan Hope CXXVII possesses 50 Vote Points. >> > Exactly 50?
Given that "50 Vote Points" does not mean "50 Vote Points and no other assets", it seems it shouldn't mean "50 Vote Points and no other Vote Points", either. --Ivan Hope CXXVII
