On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 9:44 PM, Charles Reiss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Based on the result of the appeal, I don't think there's any good > reason to assign a judgment other than GUILTY on culpability. Now, as > for sentencing, the appeals result suggested that FINE was not harsh > enough. A sentence of APOLOGY seems a little silly this far from the > event. A sentence like EXILE - 1 second wouldn't be helpful because > ihope already took the asset-loss penalties. And Ivan Hope's voting > limit is currently 1 and likely to remain so for a while, making > CHOKEY not very interesting. And I'm not convinced that the rule > breach is harsh enough to mandate EXILE with a substantial tariff. > Comments?
The judgement of FINE on the question on sentencing is still in effect, as I never appealed it. Since it has not been appealed since then, and it has certainly been more than two weeks since it was first assigned, it now cannot be appealed. Therefore, you are powerless to assign any other sentence. --Ivan Hope XIXAXA XOXAXA XUXAXA
