On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 8:41 PM, Charles Reiss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> I intend, with the consent of the rest of the panel, to REMAND this >> case to Sgeo, so that e might judge the case again while thinking more >> clearly, and also consider the precedent of CFJ 1771. > > Appeals are support (not consent) now, so you probably need to do that > to a public forum. Nevertheless, I support that intent.
The quoted intent was sent to a public forum.
