On Sun, Jul 27, 2008 at 8:33 PM, Geoffrey Spear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sat, Jul 19, 2008 at 2:39 PM, Taral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> I can't find this on zenith. >> >> Regardless, with the support of the panel, I intend to cause the panel >> to judge REMAND. There are issues to look at here, but nothing >> warranting an override or reassignment. > > Err, I guess this is a CFJ again. I support this intent.
And now this is even more officially a CFJ. avpx or CotC Murphy, care to giv us the third support we need to remand it?
